Cubase elements 6 specs12/28/2023 ![]() When i first had Cubase on my hands, i was used to FL Studio, its workflow and features.Ĭubase was completely new to me, so of course, i had to check it out, and i can't believe how amazing it really is, yet im too lazy to get myself off the plane and start using it for good, because of my earlier experience with FL Studio.īut today, i'm using it confidentially to its purpose, i love it, it has everything that FL Studio lacks in quality. I decided to buy Cubase when i was studying, since Steinberg gives huge discount if you study music, when you buy their products as EDU versions, even though they're basicly full versions, even after you upgrade them. ![]() it could be called Innuendo LOL or Mixbase 32C I think Harrison and Steinberg need to team up and build the world beating DAW with the sonics, perfect latency compensaton track by track. The latency compensation allows me to use stuff in loops in real time like protools HD systems SX was my jam for 3 versions so this is like going home. It also can't import basic mixer settings from older versions, so i have to reebuild any routing on this stuff,however I was ererouting to my console anyway. and also for the dreary stock, gray look. I dock 1 star for being unlike every other DAW I have in how it deals with my MOTU's multiple monitors routing. so I made a cubase template for my routing and now I just kick that shit on to work on Mike's stuff. It took my a full day, like 12 hours of fiddling to figure out that my usual MOTU internal routing isn't to cubase's liking. So he offered to buy me 11 after a friend made sure the SX files still basically opened, edits and time signatures etc, in 11 pro. My copy of cubase 8 or whatever that I never updated wound up migrating to my new machine and then wouldn't see my motu gear. He records into cubase sx2 on a win xp svc pack3 machine. I'm mixing hours of live material for my bst friend. The ARA2 implementation and wealth of new features inside Cubase will probably make it worth it for you too! =D Version: Steinberg Cubase 10.5 Yay to that!įor me, the sidechain architecture alone makes the jump to version 10 worth it. They didn't try to rush to be first and have to deal with the consequences of shitty design. Steinberg implemented it perfectly! Such a welcome sight. I anticipate most users would rather take advantage of the ARA2 protocol and pull up something like VocALign. ![]() While the implementation is not visually the most pleasing, it works flawlessly (look at the send effects section of your sidechain source to see what I mean Steinberg should have taken a page out of Avid's playbook and had the send slots be taken up only if you're sending to a sidechain destination).Īudio alignment is also really handy. Can now both send to a sidechain destination and receive from a sidechain source (used to only be able to send to a sidechain destination). The much improved sidechain architecture is a welcome surprise. ![]() I'll stop rambling I just love Cubase so much! There also seems to be an inconsistency in the fonts used for the program & horrible upscaling when using a monitor over 1080p. I define "redone GUI" as something "simpler" to not overwhelm users coming from DAWs like Ableton, Logic & Pro Tools. ![]() Imo if Cubase had a gapless audio engine & redone GUI, it'd be the perfect DAW. I'm able to do this & more standard/niche tasks while having a very stable experience (the surefire way to get a stable experience as a Windows user is to follow Steinberg's suggestions laid out in this article: ). Built-in post-fader inserts (no need to create a post-fader send less channels to manage in your session).Flipping the left/right locators for a loop range such that it skips the loop entirely during playback (cycle at the top goes from purple to orange when the locators are flipped for easy reference).A built-in software control room for cue mixes, talkback & room correction separate from the DAW's mixer page.ASIO Guard for being able to load more plugins by pre-calculating the buffer cycles as opposed to doing processing calculations during playback.Here are some indispensable "niche" features that I use on a daily basis: Cubase is so close to reaching perfection imo. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |